There are 2 replies, with the last one on October 23 2014 at 01:05:15 by Zardoz2293
Quote:
In the example image below you can see how there is significant screen real estate below not being allocated to remove the vertical scroll. See vertical scroll control top-right (this shouldn't exist as there is lots of room below).
[img]http://i.imgur.com/KYWqyZP.png[/img]
If the end-user changes the split between the two controls Macrium Reflect should retain control position/size from session to session. Not only is it inconvenient to continuously correct but it's a waste of time. Currently Macrium Reflect will return the control positions back to the above screen shot configuration, which isn't productive for the end-user. Request enhancement of product to retain the end-user settings in the GUI from session to session.
[img]http://i.imgur.com/3f5q7n7.png[/img]
---
Reflect Pro (64-Bit) - Current Version | Windows 7 Ultimate | Sabertooth X58, i7-980X @4.3GHz, 24GB @PC3-14400
Quote:
In the example image below you can see how there is significant screen real estate below not being allocated to remove the vertical scroll. See vertical scroll control top-right (this shouldn't exist as there is lots of room below).
[img]http://i.imgur.com/KYWqyZP.png[/img]
If the end-user changes the split between the two controls Macrium Reflect should retain control position/size from session to session. Not only is it inconvenient to continuously correct but it's a waste of time. Currently Macrium Reflect will return the control positions back to the above screen shot configuration, which isn't productive for the end-user. Request enhancement of product to retain the end-user settings in the GUI from session to session.
[img]http://i.imgur.com/3f5q7n7.png[/img]
---
Reflect Pro (64-Bit) - Current Version | Windows 7 Ultimate | Sabertooth X58, i7-980X @4.3GHz, 24GB @PC3-14400